Climate Change

[Bluey]

Real Climate Science - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have a right to your opinion, the worlds climate has never been exact, the ice age and the melting of 1 mile of ice over the UK when it finished, both were variants of climate, as was the little ice age that started around the year 1300, as was the record heat waves in the USA in the 1930s..

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

Difference Between Fact and Opinion (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences

Nine significant differences between fact and opinion are discussed in this article in detail. One such difference is that the fact is an objective reality whereas opinion is a subjective statement.

keydifferences.com

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

You have a right to your opinion, the worlds climate has never been exact, the ice age and the melting of 1 mile of ice over the UK when it finished, both were variants of climate, as was the little ice age that started around the year 1300, as was the record heat waves in the USA in the 1930s..

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/shonky

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

World of Change: Global Temperatures

The average global temperature has increased by a little more than 1° Celsius (2° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

 

[Bluey]

If the scientists were fair dinkum they wouldnt have to cherry pick data, anybody wanting balance should Google "climategate" where data that showed no heating and didnt suit the agenda of scientists was left out.

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

If the scientists were fair dinkum they wouldnt have to cherry pick data, anybody wanting balance should Google "climategate" where data that showed no heating and didnt suit the agenda of scientists was left out.

Talk about cherry picking! This "realclimatescience" QUACK has zero credibility so keep quoting this Trump stooge all you like. I like a good laugh!

Real Climate Science - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Real Climate Science​

---

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

• Overall, we rate Real Climate Science a Quackery level pseudoscience website as well as a moderate conspiracy website based on promoting that the solutions for climate change lead to communism. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and a complete rejection of the consensus of science regarding human-influenced climate change.

---

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


History
Founded in 2015, Real Climate Science is a skeptical climate science blog created by Tony Heller (formerly known as Steven Goddard). According to their about page, Tony Heller is an electrical engineer who worked as a science teacher and geologist. The page further states, “climate science doesn’t work because it is done largely by dishonest, incompetent hacks who don’t follow or even understand any legitimate methodology.”
Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership​

Real Climate Science is owned by Tony Heller and is funded through advertising and donations.

Analysis / Bias​

In review, Real Climate Science is the personal blog of Tony Heller, whose mission is to debunk the consensus that climate change is strongly human-influenced. Articles and headlines often feature highly emotional wording such as this Alarmists Using Children For Climate Fodder. This is a video story narrated by Tony Heller that claims the solutions for climate change are the same as communism. Politically, Real Climate Science aligns with the right through the support of former President Trump’s environmental deregulation and human-influenced climate change denial Obama’s Plan Vs. Trump’s Plan. In general, Tony Heller and his Real Climate Science blog believe that climate change is The Biggest Fraud In History. This theory is at odds with the consensus of science. According to a recent report by Cornell University, “More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.”

Most of the information published on this blog is not derived from peer-reviewed research; in fact, Mr. Heller explains why peer-reviewed studies in climate change are “worthless” Why Climate Science Peer Review Is Worthless. In general, Real Climate Science is opposed to Real Climate Science.

 

[Bluey]

But there you go, typical of the left, you rubbish any opinion that doesnt suit your agenda, care to comment on "climate gate"..?

Talk about cherry picking! This "realclimatescience" QUACK has zero credibility so keep quoting this Trump stooge all you like. I like a good laugh!

Real Climate Science - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Real Climate Science​

---

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

• Overall, we rate Real Climate Science a Quackery level pseudoscience website as well as a moderate conspiracy website based on promoting that the solutions for climate change lead to communism. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and a complete rejection of the consensus of science regarding human-influenced climate change.

---

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


History
Founded in 2015, Real Climate Science is a skeptical climate science blog created by Tony Heller (formerly known as Steven Goddard). According to their about page, Tony Heller is an electrical engineer who worked as a science teacher and geologist. The page further states, “climate science doesn’t work because it is done largely by dishonest, incompetent hacks who don’t follow or even understand any legitimate methodology.”
Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership​

Real Climate Science is owned by Tony Heller and is funded through advertising and donations.

Analysis / Bias​

In review, Real Climate Science is the personal blog of Tony Heller, whose mission is to debunk the consensus that climate change is strongly human-influenced. Articles and headlines often feature highly emotional wording such as this Alarmists Using Children For Climate Fodder. This is a video story narrated by Tony Heller that claims the solutions for climate change are the same as communism. Politically, Real Climate Science aligns with the right through the support of former President Trump’s environmental deregulation and human-influenced climate change denial Obama’s Plan Vs. Trump’s Plan. In general, Tony Heller and his Real Climate Science blog believe that climate change is The Biggest Fraud In History. This theory is at odds with the consensus of science. According to a recent report by Cornell University, “More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.”

Most of the information published on this blog is not derived from peer-reviewed research; in fact, Mr. Heller explains why peer-reviewed studies in climate change are “worthless” Why Climate Science Peer Review Is Worthless. In general, Real Climate Science is opposed to Real Climate Science.

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

But there you go, typical of the left, you rubbish any opinion that doesnt suit your agenda, care to comment on "climate gate"..?

Sure. You're an ignorant buffoon.

 

[Bluey]

And there you go princess, the forum is to put up differing opinions ect and you just cant handle that, just like the silly climate action girls who glue themselves to roads ect you just cant handle anybody not swallowing the religion of climate change so you throw insults, you lose........

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

And there you go princess, the forum is to put up differing opinions ect and you just cant handle that, just like the silly climate action girls who glue themselves to roads ect you just cant handle anybody not swallowing the religion of climate change so you throw insults, you lose........

As I keep trying to demonstrate to no avail, it is not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact!

You and your extremist far white ring lot continue to treat science and scientists like it's politics. It isn't. Science is not politics. Real science proves and establishes actual facts. It is not a matter of opinion. The facts are absolutely clear. The debate is long over. Your side lost a long time ago. You're like the Japanese soldier on some remote island who doesn't realise or accept the war is long over and you want to keep fighting.

I love differing opinions. Both sensible ones and really dumb ones.

 

[Bluey]

But thats where you ignore the fact that many scientists are against the climate change agenda, and just because i differ in opinion on climate change your trying to make out i am a far right white extremist, cant you handle debate without insulting people who dont agree with your blinkered opinion?, you lose again, i mean really how old are you?.

As I keep trying to demonstrate to no avail, it is not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact!

You and your extremist far white ring lot continue to treat science and scientists like it's politics. It isn't. Science is not politics. Real science proves and establishes actual facts. It is not a matter of opinion. The facts are absolutely clear. The debate is long over. Your side lost a long time ago. You're like the Japanese soldier on some remote island who doesn't realise or accept the war is long over and you want to keep fighting.

I love differing opinions. Both sensible ones and really dumb ones.

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

But thats where you ignore the fact that many scientists are against the climate change agenda

‘Case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans

Trawl of 90,000 studies finds consensus, leading to call for Facebook and Twitter to curb disinformation

www.theguardian.com

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

99.9% of scientists agree on human-caused climate change | NationofChange

www.nationofchange.org

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

phys.org

'Delay Is the New Denial': 99.9% of scientists agree on climate change | Red, Green, and Blue

The lead author of a new study showing that 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers released over the past decade agree that global heating is caused primarily by human activity said Tuesday that the research should be “the last word” in the purported—but largely contrived—debate about what’s...

redgreenandblue.org

Over 99.9% of the published science agrees: climate change is caused by humans

Remember that study that said 97%? Well, it's now 99.9%.

www.zmescience.com

"and just because i differ in opinion on climate change your trying to make out i am a far right white extremist"

No, not just because of that. I have a pretty good memory and from our past interactions regarding race, I know for certain that you are a far right extremist, not just because you reconfirm this by throwing pseudoscientific quackery from a Trump stooge up in this thread - which is plenty.

Now, I really don't want to converse with you anymore because I find you incredibly distasteful.

 

[Bluey]

Hey im cool with that, your the one that resorted to name calling, like i said when you stoop like that you lose..
And im sure you must be 15 or 16 at best..

 

[MegaRabbitoh]

Hey im cool with that, your the one that resorted to name calling, like i said when you stoop like that you lose..

I didn't know we were playing children's games (even though you labelled me left and called me a Princess. Hello!). Typical white ringer self righteous nonsense argument. It's not about me or you or some debate on a forum, it's about life or death and the future of our planet A tiny bit more important but you clearly don't care. You just want to score cheap pointless points. What a disgrace!

 

[Bluey]

No its about a balanced argument, and as for climate you might look at what China and India are pumping out carbon wise, and i am not scoring cheap points, your the one who threw insults, ie you called me a buffoon?, as for the science its not settled, they said the same about the hole in the ozone layer, we were all going to fry, and what i posted re " climate gate" is very important but you ignored that important fact, now i do agree with you on one thing, you cant rationally debate the issue without throwing insults so i agree with you and dont wish to have you respond to any post i make in the future, and ive never heard of a " white ringer"..

I didn't know we were playing children's games (even though you labelled me left and called me a Princess. Hello!). Typical white ringer self righteous nonsense argument. It's not about me or you or some debate on a forum, it's about life or death and the future of our planet A tiny bit more important but you clearly don't care. You just want to score cheap pointless points. What a disgrace!