southsport
Grand Master
- Joined
- 20 Sep 2013
- Messages
- 13,342
- Reaction score
- 1,848
They get away with it because the media don't talk about it.How do the Rorters continually get away with what is blatantly obvious?
.
You must be logged in to view threads on this forum. Please sign up by clicking here to continue viewing content on the mighty South Sydney Rabbitohs.
They get away with it because the media don't talk about it.How do the Rorters continually get away with what is blatantly obvious?
I would not have been happy to keep him fullstop, not worth any more than around 250k.I understand he would have looked good on our right wing but he also wanted $700K plus to play for us and thats a lot to spend on a winger.
Would everyone still be happy if we had kept him and lost Latrell or Graham etc
You can't fix stupid.reading the game day threads there’s a few who want us to lose Latrell
I just want him to play for Souths rather than do his media personality gig!reading the game day threads there’s a few who want us to lose Latrell
Definitely was multiple articles.I don’t recall media at the time quoting a cut price deal for Sualii to the Roosters. Only that they were happy to accomodate yearly exit windows.
If someone has an article that quotes him going there for unders at the time, please share.
Bloke compares himself to Bradman.
Isnt is just a general rule that players go to the Roosters for unders?I don’t recall media at the time quoting a cut price deal for Sualii to the Roosters. Only that they were happy to accomodate yearly exit windows.
If someone has an article that quotes him going there for unders at the time, please share.
They bought out the first year of his development contract for $100kDefinitely was multiple articles.
Said that they’d signed him for significantly less than the $700k on offer at the Rabbitohs, but that he had the flexibility of yearly options.
He should be comparing himself to a muppetBloke compares himself to Bradman.