A couple of things.
Firstly I have no idea why people are so bogged down and obsessed with how many metres a fullback makes, when it proves absolutely nothing.
If a fullback is playing against a team like Penrith who kick deep and sometimes early, the fullback will take the ball and probably run around 20 to 30 metres before he even meets the defensive line, even if he gets smashed to the ground once they contact.
Do that 5 times in each half and you have run metre figures of 200 to 300 hundred for the game, but have not really made any ground through the defence or contributed much overall.
Conversely, a full back could finish the game with say 60 metres, which could include a line break, a try, and a try assist. But people would bag him for not being involved enough.
I honestly feel people listen to commentators far too much and don’t actually evaluate the contribution of a player, they will just go on stats.
Latts has already been bagged by some for his game yesterday. I thought he had a good game, almost every instance of good football, he was involved in, some of his touches in attack and defence were classy stuff.
Yet we see Tedesco almost every game running backwards, sideways, and making the attack break down by hogging the ball, yet people jump into a circle-jerk over him because he might have 250 metres for the game.
Seriously, listen less to alleged experts and their stats, and instead actually watch the game and trust your eyes.