Thanks to members helping me out with this...I feel truly empowered.
I get frustrated hearing about team reviews... often we only hear the 'highly sanitized findings' with the usual cliched summary and some assistant coaches getting burned as a byproduct.
So I felt it would be interesting to get at least a quantitive evaluation from fellow supporters.
If participants are happy, I would like to set some 'voting' guidelines that will allow you to express your vies in a manner that allows cumulative results to be summarised in a meaningful way while still allowing free form verbatim comments.
So before continuing, I would like to set a time of ... say 1 week to consider inputs about the guidelines from others.
Then, after reviewing... if there is sufficient interest in proceeding, I will move onto the next step.
Ultimately... if this progresses, I am happy to collate and report the final results of what we the fans think.
Over to you!
I get frustrated hearing about team reviews... often we only hear the 'highly sanitized findings' with the usual cliched summary and some assistant coaches getting burned as a byproduct.
So I felt it would be interesting to get at least a quantitive evaluation from fellow supporters.
If participants are happy, I would like to set some 'voting' guidelines that will allow you to express your vies in a manner that allows cumulative results to be summarised in a meaningful way while still allowing free form verbatim comments.
So before continuing, I would like to set a time of ... say 1 week to consider inputs about the guidelines from others.
Then, after reviewing... if there is sufficient interest in proceeding, I will move onto the next step.
Ultimately... if this progresses, I am happy to collate and report the final results of what we the fans think.
Over to you!