Prowsey
Grand Master
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 14,896
- Karma
- 7,821
You know what's wonderful...you're entitled to your opinion even when it's completely wrong and demonstrates ignorance of the rules.PS ... I watched again on the mini replay of games on Foxtel and in my opinion... it was DEFINITELY forward imo
To reiterate...the forward pass rule states that a pass is forward if it's propelled forward out of the hands.
What happens after that is irrelevant.
Latrell's pass was not propelled forward out of the hands. It was flat at worse but every replay I've seen clearly shows it was backwards out of the hands.
If it then takes a 90 degree turn and looks like a gridiron pass, it means nothing.
It also means nothing if Tass caught the ball on the try line.
I'd suggest that you look at the relative positions of Latrell and Tass at the point of the pass.
Not from this 57 yr + supporter. Stating how long someone supports the club seems nonsenical to me, but there you go.Ps3...I wonder what the reaction of many of our members would have been if the Roosters had won the game with a similar pass
Dare I suggest it would have been very much different
I'd be pissed off that my winger didn't defend the pass, and annoyed that they scored.
But I'd be vociferous that it wasn't a forward pass.
Just as I was vociferous that the Roosters pass that everyone bar the touchy thought was forward, was clearly forward out of the hands.