Rabbits21
Grand Master
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 20,454
- Reaction score
- 12,937
You must be logged in to view threads on this forum. Please sign up by clicking here to continue viewing content on the mighty South Sydney Rabbitohs.
Exactly what Souths needed to do as well
and yet we have signed 3 of their most promising juniors.
Who are they?and yet we have signed 3 of their most promising juniors.
Not really. Wayne is not going to work under a GM of Football, he doesn’t need his hand held or to be kept in check - Madge on the other hand…..Exactly what Souths needed to do as well
McCarthy, Penitani and A'attaWho are they?
We have a head of football, he’s just not very good.Not really. Wayne is not going to work under a GM of Football, he doesn’t need his hand held or to be kept in check - Madge on the other hand…..
If you get caught by the cops drink or drug driving you get a suspension and fine. It’s a lot bigger penalty if someone gets hurt while doing it so it’s logical that the NRL would work the same way when it comes to his punishmentI’m a little bit lost on the ban discussion logic.
We’ve had players who got caught unlicensed and under the influence. No one suggested they get a 12 month ban.
But journos are throwing out the idea of a 12 month ban, because the act, that others have been caught doing, resulted in a crash as opposed to a pull over and arrest?
That doesn’t make much sense to me.
If (and it’s an if) the club see Wayne as a 3-year only proposition.We have a head of football, he’s just not very good.
Hence the need for a clean out
You will always get smacked harder for causing actual harm vs potentially causing harm.I’m a little bit lost on the ban discussion logic.
We’ve had players who got caught unlicensed and under the influence. No one suggested they get a 12 month ban.
But journos are throwing out the idea of a 12 month ban, because the act, that others have been caught doing, resulted in a crash as opposed to a pull over and arrest?
That doesn’t make much sense to me.
Just interesting the difference in sentiment when it comes to on field offences. We’re constantly hearing that the injury shouldn’t be tied to the offence (although many feel it does).You will always get smacked harder for causing actual harm vs potentially causing harm.
The grading 100% is influenced by the outcome of the illegal play. It’s in the judiciary grading rules.Just interesting the difference in sentiment when it comes to on field offences. We’re constantly hearing that the injury shouldn’t be tied to the offence (although many feel it does).
It’s an interesting nuance.