• You must be logged in to view threads on this forum. Please sign up by clicking here to continue viewing content on the mighty South Sydney Rabbitohs.

2025 News, General Articles and Discussion

Canterbury taking a home game to Allianz. Hopefully that helps our cause for a full time move.
 

Glad that they aren't making any big changes for this year.

I don't really agree with this new proposed 'sin-bin once they fail the HIA' thing though. I think it's going to make things pretty messy and may interrupt the flow of a game more? I do see the logic in it though, would provide a bit more consistency around sin-bins. See how it goes in the trials I guess.

The new interpretations on exsisting rules sound good in principle, but are they going to last? We've heard this all before about a crackdown, only for it to last like five weeks. They need to stick with it, otherwise, what's the point?

Hope they can.
 
Haha that's great.

Nathan Cleary love taps some plodder on the chin with 15 mins to go. All-of-a-sudden word comes out from the dressing room that said plodder has failed his HIA and Cleary has to go off to the bin.....

Yeah, that won't be rorted at all.

Also how good's it going to be when the try of the year is taken off someone because the video ref determined they didn't make a "genuine attempt" to play it with their foot.
 
They won’t stick with it Callmack you and I both know that mate.
 
Sending a message: NRL's obstruction tweak puts defenders on the back foot
Sport


The days of defenders 'milking penalties' or being rewarded for poor defensive reads are over after the NRL tweaked the way the obstruction rule is interpreted for the new season.
NRL head of football Graham Annesley wrote to all the clubs yesterday alerting them to how key aspects of on-field play will be policed in 2025.
The main areas of focus will be better compliance regarding correct play-the-balls, ensuring defensive lines are back the requisite 10 metres and the Herald's revelations about how head office will attempt to be more consistent with sin binnings for high tackles.
However, the biggest change to the way the game will be adjudicated applies to obstructions, with the NRL seeking 'to achieve a better balance between rewarding the tactical use of
lead-runners to deceive the defence, and ensuring defensive structures are afforded a fair opportunity to adjust, while also minimising the incentive for defenders to 'game' or 'play for' obstruction penalties'.
In the missive, obtained by the Herald, Annesley said the philosophy behind the interpretation change was to ensure:
■ 'Successful deception in an attacking play should be rewarded'; and
■ 'Poor defensive reads, or defenders attempting to 'milk' penalties, should not be rewarded.'
Further, the note states that: 'A try will be awarded, if in the opinion of match officials, any contact between a lead runner and a defender would not have prevented the try from being scored.'
The key considerations listed for match officials included whether the defender was deceived by the block
or lead runner, whether the contact was forceful or minor, who initiated the contact, and whether the defender played for a penalty rather than genuinely attempted to chase the ball.
A no-try decision against Penrith in last year's preliminary final win against Cronulla angered Ivan Cleary, who claimed the decision was 'terrible' and that officials had 'no understanding' of what his team was trying to achieve. After the interpretation tweak, the same play would result in a try this year.
In relation to play-the-balls, the NRL is calling for the tackled player 'to make a genuine attempt to play the ball with the foot while maintaining balance'.
'In 2025, if players do not meet the required standard, the referee will order a handover of possession as prescribed under the rules,' the memo states.
To ensure defenders are back a genuine 10 metres, they will be required to have both feet in line with, or behind where, the referee rules the line. Players won't be able to move forward until the whistleblower says 'go', rather than when the ball is placed on the ground or any other in-
dicator.
The pre-season will also be a trial for the new sin-bin rules for high tackles, which are as follows:
■ If a victim of a high tackle is removed for a category-one head-injury assessment, or fails a category-two and can't return to the field, the player who commits the offence will be sent to the sin bin for 10 minutes.
■ If the victim of the high tackle remains on the field or passes the category-two assessment and is eligible to continue the game - regardless of whether they come back on or not - the player who committed the offence will not go to the sin bin.
The referee will still have the discretion to send players from the field for the rest of the game in the case of serious offences. The trial will be monitored by the ARL Commission and may be repeated later in the season in games that have no bearing on the finals.
 
My only issue with any new interpretations is, why on earth do they not trial them in NSW Cup and QLD Cup for 12 months before bringing them to grade?

The game is played the way it is for yonks, yet when they make a change they do it overnight.
 
Rules trial:

So you can be sinbinned 10 mins after you commit the offence?

I suspect a lot of players are going to fail concussion tests late in games when they are behind.
 
Rules trial:

So you can be sinbinned 10 mins after you commit the offence?

I suspect a lot of players are going to fail concussion tests late in games when they are behind.
aren't they done by an independent doc?
 

Back
Top